Just a couple of comments.phil_l wrote: ↑Sun 13 May 2018 15:19 This raises absolutely no questions.
Look at the credits of Hans Zimmer soundtracks , everything is clearly stated :
orchestrators
additional composers
arrangers
conductors
mixer
sample makers
synth programming
musicians
technical advisor
interns
Crediting people is admitting that they do exist. I don't see what more Hans need to do .
You cant write in the end credits :
"Music by HZ , Orchestrators, arrangers, conductors, msuicians, copyists"
as much as you dont put
"Movie directed by James Cameron, 2nd director unit , 3rd director, assistant director, "
The architect, and the chief of the department is credited first.
So what about the set decorator?
It's often written "set decoration by xx" where xx is one person. But you have 40 people working
on the set decoration.
1. regarding the set decorator quote:
Logical Fallacy - False Equivalence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence
You are creating an equal footing between two disparate sectors of a film production team, and trying to use one to prove the behavior of another. Logical Fallacy. The Union for set designers and decorators is vastly different than AF of M and composers, it's not appropriate to use them as counter arguments.
2. regarding the quote, "Crediting people is admitting that they do exist. I don't see what more Hans need to do ."
Logical Fallacy - Argument from Incredulity:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_fallacy
You "can't imagine what else he could have done", so therefore, Hans's points are valid. Logical Fallacy. You're not an authority on RCP's business workings, nor the negotiations that Gorfaine-Schwartz did with the production company, therefore, your imagination is not a valid argument.
And lastly, regarding the statement that "Hans credited the orchestrators, etc. etc." as an argument that he therefore properly credited the assistance in composing/creating his cue (the final game):
Logical Fallacy of Composition
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/composition-division
Assuming that one part of an argument applies to all, or vice versa.
The fact that Hans credited orchestrators and arrangers over the entire film, does not preclude him specifically stating that he used additional musical help on that particular cue (the final game). He could have used orchestrators on SOME cues, and not others. Again, we don't know what the business arrangements were in the contract. What we DO know, is that Hans stated explicitly that he composed and arranged every note of that cue (The final Game) himself, and that his assistants (which he admitted he had), did a verbatim takedown of that, and did not add/change/subtract, or otherwise edit his music.
The purpose of this discourse is to establish... is THAT STATEMENT true? Is Hans's demo musically identical to what we hear in the film? It's that simple. Everything else is smoke, mirrors, distractions... or logical fallacies.
I look forward to your arguments on the point I made above.
Mike